Showing posts with label social media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social media. Show all posts

Monday, July 16, 2007

Why StumbleUpon 'Owns' Digg

After all of the endless hype surrounding Digg, I was surprised to read this article by Darren Rowse at Problogger: Why StumbleUpon Sends More Traffic than Digg.

Hmmm, I thought, time to try it out! So, after finding out that StumbleUpon doesn't accept an all-numeric user ID, I signed up as 1389AD. I set up the little toolbar and started using it. Then, I ran across an article that came out a few months ago, but is still very much worth reading, so I used the toolbar to submit a review of the article on StumbleUpon: My Thoughts on Our Children's Children's War.

I was surprised at what happened next, and you probably will be too. Read all about it here: How to Bury Digg.com.

StumbleUpon Button Stumble It!

Technorati tags:







Friday, July 13, 2007

David All shows us what we should be doing with Web 2.0

Here are some "must read" articles from Republican web strategist David All of the David All Group:

StumbleUpon Button Stumble It!

Technorati tags:






Friday, July 6, 2007

Exclusive: Techrigy "Technology Evangelist" Adam Steinberg

FHK members and staff had the pleasure of interviewing Adam Steinberg, a “Technology Evangelist,” with Techrigy at this week’s Monday-night conference. FHK’s WikiTek, AJ, led the interview, and Adam shared his knowledge and opinions of using wikis as a social networking tool online and in the enterprise, of the future of social networking, and of Techrigy’s exciting new SM2 product, a risk-management tool for social media, which is set to launch at the end of July.

The interview, conducted in chat-room format, has been edited by FHK for length, and clarity.

Social Networking and the Enterprise

FHK: OK...let's start out with the biggie. We're looking at a huge boom in social networking for personal use, and to some extent for small businesses. What's the state of social networking in the enterprise, both within the enterprise, and for reaching out beyond it?

Adam: Well, I think it's definitely still early for social networking in the enterprise. We've been seeing some early adopters, namely the IBM’s of the world. "Social networking" was certainly a buzz word at the Enterprise 2.0 conference a few weeks ago.

FHK: IBM has been using internal e-mail for decades, and extended it to their customers a long time back.

Adam: But, I still think a few F1000 companies think of MySpace when it comes to social networking, so I still think it's about 12-18 months from hitting mainstream in the enterprise. But we're certainly seeing action outside the enterprise. It's certainly growing fast. LinkedIn is huge, of course, and we're seeing Facebook really becoming a professional network as students graduate from college and enter the work force.

FHK: Is LinkedIn used mostly for recruitment or for other purposes as well?

Adam: Yes, recruitment, but also finding old connections, as I've used it, as well as looking for potential startup partners.

FHK: Such as sharing expertise?

Adam: Exactly, and for recommendations as well…However, it's fallen behind Facebook, and they've just announced they'll open up their platform, similar to what Facebook just did.

FHK: Why do you suppose that is?

Adam: I'd say they just became stagnant. They owned a niche of professionals until very recently, but Facebook is just innovating twice as fast as anyone else. As younger Facebook users migrate to the workplace, they aren't going to leave their network behind.

FHK: Do you notice a phenomenon of people networking in one venue, and then moving on, en masse, to the next thing that looks more exciting?

Adam: Sure, as better technologies and networks come along; there is usually a cycle of early adopters and then rapid acceptance, as long as the technology is worth switching. I don’t think you see too many people switching from MySpace to Facebook. I think you see many people, when deciding which network to join, picking Facebook instead of MySpace, now, whereas two years ago, MySpace was the leader

FHK: Our impression is that MySpace is more for the entertainment world, especially music, and fans of specific bands.

Adam: I think you are right, especially now. Previously, Facebook limited its users to college students. They opened it up to anyone last year, and now we see high school students joining Facebook instead of MySpace. It’s really quite phenomenal.

FHK: Well, yes…there's a prestige factor for HS kids to join with their college soon-to-be peers.

Adam: Yes, that's certainly part of it

FHK: Where do you see Wikis fitting into the social networking trends: particularly specialized wikis, other than the 900-pound gorilla, Wikipedia itself?

Adam: I think wikis are really going to be huge in the next twelve months. We're going to see wikis take off just as blogs have, especially within the enterprise. When we first started indexing wikis on WikiTag, we'd search for random keywords reflecting hobbies of ours, and we'd be amazed at the wiki communities that popped up. These were strong communities, with strong knowledge bases around the most obscure topics, so it really seems like there is something for everyone in the wiki world.

FHK: Examples?

Adam: Well, one of the most memorable is Wookieepedia.

FHK: Star Wars in general, or just Chewbacca?

Adam: From what I recall, it's the complete star wars universe, which isn't the most obscure interest in the world, but it's amazing to see the number of users, and how devoted they are to these communities. These communities have existed for years.

Techrigy’s SM2

FHK: What about wikis for software support, wikis for systems support in an organization, customer service wikis...less exciting, perhaps, but more practical (maybe).

Adam: Those are really taking off as well, and I think they’re equally exciting. Just at Techrigy, we're using multiple wikis with a staff of about 12 people. We're seeing IBM’s of the world with thousands of wikis.

FHK: What do you think of opening up the support wikis to the customer base, to allow customers and clients to contribute their knowledge?

Adam: Oh I think it's outstanding. Practically every medium to large size company uses wikis, or wants to use wikis. Its a perfect way to communicate and collaborate with customers.

FHK: What are the steps for getting started with a wiki in the corporate world?

Adam: Well, there are really a number of different platforms. SharePoint really seems to be taking off; they have a nice platform. There are other strong players as well - Socialtext, TWiki.

FHK: What do you think about Wikispaces?

Adam: Wikispaces is a great option as well - in fact, I just spoke with a manager from SourceForge today, who mentioned that they've integrated Wikispaces. Honestly, there are many great options. The harder part, sometimes, is convincing management to let employees use wikis and social media.

FHK: What are their objections?

Adam: Well, if hundreds or thousands of employees are using wikis or blogs, how do managers keep track of who is saying what in terms of the corporate image, correctness of information about company products and services, etc.? There are a lot of risks associated with letting thousands of people communicate, especially if the wiki is public and open to customers.

FHK: There are security issues to think about, too.

Adam: Sure, but beyond that: liabilities, defamation, Sarbanes-Oxley, the list goes on. It's really email to the next level. That's probably been the biggest obstacle to adoption, not so much technical, but just on an overall compliance level.

FHK: And that's what your new product is designed to remedy?

Adam: Yes, SM2 is a risk management tool for social media.

FHK: What about the issue of how to get started...I don't mean choice of platform, but of how to structure the project, how to structure the Wiki itself in terms of what to cover. Does your product address those issues as well...allowing the management to set the theme?

Adam: SM2 helps management know who's using social media, what they're saying, and if they are creating liabilities. It's really a tool to help management become comfortable with these media, because people are going to use them whether management gives the okay or not. If the CEO says no, the employees will just blog from home.

FHK: Are there tools for validating information that is put into the wiki?

Adam: We actually don't address this, as we aren't part of the wiki or blogging package. We’re more of a monitoring layer on top of the content. I think that would be setup on the IT level, in accordance with company policy, etc., although we can do some monitoring to verify this.

FHK: What kind of reports does your software generate?

Adam: SM2 will provide real-time notifications of compliance violations. For instance, if you wanted to know anytime someone posted a SSN, or anytime someone used a curse word on the company wikis, or anytime someone blogging from home started bad-mouthing the company. There are an infinite number of rules that an organization can create within SM2, which does come loaded with a base set of policies.

FHK: What about making sure that valid customer complaints are being addressed?

Adam: Hmm, that's an interesting angle we haven't really thought about; we've been more concerned with compliance and risk-management, but that’s an interesting angle.

FHK: SM2...it covers more than Wikis then?

Adam: Yes, it does blogs, as well. Blogs are probably the bigger risk, especially away from the work place.

FHK: What you're talking about, with the blogs, sounds more like organizational reputation management.

Adam: Yes, that's almost exactly it. We do a few other things with compliance, namely record retention, but I think you hit the nail on the head.

FHK: What would you like our community to know about your SM2 product, Adam?

Adam: Really, we’re just hoping to help speed up the adoption process of these social media by addressing some of the concerns organizations have with these media…Not the right to control what people are saying, but to know what people are saying.

FHK: Would your software be helpful for political campaigns, activist groups, and the like?

Adam: Absolutely. How does a campaign manager know what people are saying in the blogosphere, particularly staffers?

FHK: Right now, they're using Google Alerts, or something similar. Some of the liberal candidates have had embarrassing experiences with blogging misbehavior on the part of their staffers.

Adam: I was just thinking of that…SM2 would have been helpful in that situation.

FHK: What about chat room behavior that may be traced back to individuals?

Adam: SM2 doesn't address that directly; I think there are other IM compliance packages that do address this behavior. IM is another huge risk for organizations.

What to do with Wikis

FHK: Adam, back to your experience in working with Wikis, Do you have suggestions for making wikis more searchable online?

Adam: Use WikiTag!

FHK: We have signed up for WikiTag, but tell us more about it for the benefit of our readers.

Adam: Well, WikiTag actually started out as just a side project, but we've seen a real need for it. We're hoping to work with all of the wiki farms and start indexing their content, allowing users to tag those wikis, obviously, to make them more searchable. That combination of indexing and tagging would be a nice start. As I mentioned, there are so many small gems out there in the wiki community, that we really need a way for people to be able to find these wikis and connect with others.

FHK: How does a wiki organizer go about using WikiTag to tag their wiki?

Adam: Just go to http://www.wikitag.us/. Click o the “share a wiki” link, and then register your wiki. You can tag it with keywords describing that wiki as well; then, anyone will be able to search and find your wiki. If your wiki has already been registered, you can add additional keyword tags by doing the same process.

FHK: Do you tag specific pages within the wiki?

Adam: Right now, the technology doesn't limit that, but we're encouraging people to just tag the landing pages of each wiki so that people have a nice directory of wikis, and we don't get overrun with thousands of redundant pages.

FHK: Do you think your policy management software could be applied by the Pentagon for milblogging-control purposes?

Adam: I definitely think so. It's a perfect application for SM2, and it's a shame that the military doesn't allow our soldiers to communicate from abroad via social media. Certainly, there are security concerns, but hopefully a policy can be created that will address those, and maybe SM2 will even play a role.

FHK: Are you talking about potentially using the technology for security/surveillance?

Adam: Well, more for monitoring information flow.

Contacting Adam, and Techrigy

FHK: Is there anything else you would like our readers to know, Adam?

Adam: For those that might want to implement social media, particularly in an organization, I encourage you to head over to http://www.techrigy.com/ and check out our white papers - we have a nice library of information there about social media. I'll also be glad to help anyone anyway I can - feel free to contact me at adam@techrigy.com

Also posted on the Ft. Hard Knox Blog.

Follow-up: Post on Adam's new blog, Techrigy

StumbleUpon Button Stumble It!

Technorati tags:













Twitter vs. Pownce - With Rolling Updates

Rolling updates follow the main body of this article.

As you may have noticed, 1389 is a frequent Twitter user. While I don't claim that Twitter is perfect - it does suffer occasional glitches and outages - I find Twitter to be a useful and entertaining social networking tool, and one that has significant political, business, and educational uses as well.

Recently, several people associated with Digg showed up on Twitter to promote Pownce, which they consider to be a competitor to Twitter. I wondered whether the name Pownce was meant to suggest some beclawed feline predator capturing every Twitter bird that happens by.

Of course, I'm the last person who could claim to be unbiased here; I have leveled some heated criticism at Digg, its owners, its admins, its investors, and a good (or not-so-good) proportion of its user base. On the other hand, seeing so many Twitterers headed in that direction, I finally (and somewhat reluctantly) requested a Pownce invitation and signed up.

Well, guess what! I established an account, loaded up an avatar graphic, filled in my profile data, and clicked on a URL that allowed me to start adding friends. But that was it. As of today (7/3/07, 12:05 AM Eastern Time US), whenever I have tried to get into my own Pownce home page, namely http://pownce.com/1389, Pownce's 404 screen has appeared every time. My guess is that the error has something to do with my having signed up with an all-numeric Pownce user ID. Even though Pownce allowed me to do that, this may have caused some other process within Pownce to break later on. Of course, once you sign up with a user ID, Pownce doesn't let you change it if you find that it isn't working properly.

But that's not all. To my disgust, I found out that the only way I can see the messages I received earlier in the day is to rummage through the huge pileup of e-mail in my inbox. If I shut off the email option, then I can't see if anybody is trying to send me a message. So I filled out a tech support form and haven't gotten an answer. If they don't fix it soon, I'll have to chuck the whole thing, because all of that inbox e-clutter interferes with everything else I'm trying to do.

Status update as of 7/4/05:

I just want to assure everyone that everything has been fixed, and I'm now on Pownce as 1389. Thanks for fixing everything, and hope to see you all there!

Well, enough about me - you're probably wondering what the rest of the folks who have used both Pownce and Twitter have to say. Which do they prefer, and why?

Rolling Updates: More News and Opinions

Be sure to read the comments for this blog post!

StumbleUpon Button Stumble It!

Technorati tags:





TinyURL for this blog post: http://tinyurl.com/2btrt8

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

Wikipedia's "lamest edit wars"...sez who?

Why do some people look askance at Wikis in general, and at Wikipedia, the 800-pound gorilla of the Wiki world, in particular? This project page, entitled Wikipedia: Lamest edit wars, reveals the human frailties that tend to weaken the credibility of what should be a valuable social media tool.

Free and open debate is a vital part of the search for truth, but is that what we're seeing here? When it comes to certain hot-button issues, the search for truth among the Wikipedia community (such as it is) degenerates into a welter of animosity, politicking, ego-tripping, spin-doctoring, and ad hominem arguments. Evidently, the Wikipedians who wrote this project page saw no alternative but to give up on the possibility of making any further progress toward resolving these issues. Instead, they labeled these edit wars "lame," characterized all of the participants as equally unreasonable and contemptible, and held the entire process up to ridicule.

The character flaws that give rise to such ugly disputes are, sadly, part of the human condition. All too often, they are encountered not only among independent researchers, but also among those in academia, government, and the corporate world. But it's a matter of degree. In cyberspace, without traditions or established systems in place for resolving such things in a civil manner, incivility often runs rampant under cover of anonymity, and the interaction readily devolves into a flame war.

The problem is that incivility erodes credibility. Discussion and debate have a vital place in the process of building and supporting a wiki. But honest debate has nothing to do with bullying, manipulation, or spin-doctoring. Nor is there any room for the mistaken concept that truth can be arrived at simply by putting the matter up to a vote! For the wiki to earn the respect of the public, this debate must be conducted with respect for the other participants, for the readership, and, most of all, for the truth.

StumbleUpon Button Stumble It!

Technorati tags:







Monday, June 18, 2007

Social Bookmarking Made Easy with Browser Links

Those of us who enjoy social networking through bookmarking sites such as Digg, del.icio.us, and Newsvine are familiar with those little shortcut buttons, chicklets, and quicklinks that allow us to submit, vote for, and comment on our favorite web articles quickly and relatively easily.

But what if we’re reading an article with no shortcuts? Yes, we could still bookmark these the “old-fashioned” way (sign on to the various social bookmarking sites, and post the information using the url…sigh…yawn…)

OR we could take advantage of our browsers’ “links” button. Newsvine has posted a 10-second demo on how to do this with its Seed-the-vine service. It works exactly the same way with Socializer 2.0, which allows you to bookmark to multiple sites from a single page with its “Socialize this” link (Don’t forget to check out the “Create a Short Socializer Link” feature, which saves time when posting to multiple sites by providing a short url and pre-formatted post title!).

It takes a couple of minutes to set up the links initially, but for active social networkers, these little buttons will save a lot of time over the long run. All you need to do when you are on a page you want to bookmark or submit for promotion is click on the link!

Technorati tags:







Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Socializer 2.0

SocializerLogo

You know that long list of little icons at the bottom of some blog posts? They usually represent Digg, del.icio.us, reddit, Technorati, slashdot, and other social bookmarking sites. Socializer 2.0 simplifies that process. Socializer is free, by eKstreme.com webmaster tools and tutorials.

Socializer 2.0 provides several different convenient ways for surfers and webmasters to use the service.

One thing that's missing is a usable button. Maybe they'll have one soon.

Technorati tags:







Sunday, June 10, 2007

Updated: Two MORE Takes on Twitter

1389 has been on Twitter quite often recently. You're all invited to join the conversations there.

Here are some recent articles about Twitter to give you an idea of what the buzz is all about:

New:

  • Dan Mosqueda explains how he increased his Blog Traffic, using Twitter as part of the mix.
  • Connecticut blogger Joe C. answers the question, Why is Twitter So Successful? He also explains what Twitter is all about, and what to do to make friends and network successfully on Twitter. This article is a must-read for Twitter newbies!
Technorati tags:



Monday, June 4, 2007

Why Conservatives Need to Geek-Up (Part 3)

(Go to Part 1 of 3)
(Go to Part 2 of 3)

(This Third Installment is by Jenn Sierra and TXPoet, with research assistance from 1389.)

This is the third and final installment of this series explaining why Conservatives need to become more active in the Web 2.0 environment. Part One discussed the generational gap, generally between liberals and conservatives online, while Part Two discussed the how this gap is creating an imbalance of information readily available online through a typical search engine query. We will finish this series by highlighting a few of the major figures supporting Web 2.0 financially, showing how their political leaning is further compounding the imbalance in the information war.

Online social networkers are familiar with Digg.com, the current top social bookmarking site, which has enjoyed unprecedented success in social networking, through its use of bookmarking and syndication, with over 15 million visitors per month.

Where does a site like Digg get funding? Who are its investors? Primary Greylock Partners and the Omidyar Network. The Greylock Partner team is an international investor in primarily technology and medicine, with a special interest in Israel. The Omidyar Network “has invested in a variety of areas, including microfinance, participatory media, open innovation, open source and transparency in government.”
In addition to investing financially, the Omidyar Network is on mission: “Ultimately, we hope that people everywhere will constructively engage with each other to pursue what they care about most, resulting in a global society that is continually advancing social progress.”

If the name Omidyar rings a bell, it’s because Pierre Omidyar is the founder of e-Bay, a philanthropist who is #43 on Forbes’ list of billionaires, and a benefactor of a microfinance fund at Tufts University.Omidyar’s COO is Iqbal Paroo, a Shia Imami Nizari Ismaili, whose interests involve complex healthcare and higher education. He has a long history of involvement with the Aga Khan Foundation (1977-2000), and “From 1977-1980, he served the Aga Khan Foundation as both director of commissioning for the initial phase of the Aga Khan University in Karachi, Pakistan,” which has “teaching and research programmes in Pakistan, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Afghanistan and the United Kingdom,” the university is billed as “an agent of change” and “an important force for pluralism.”

Omidyar and Paroo are champions for the left’s most sacred causes, and now their organization is one of the primary investors in the largest, most influential social-networking site on the web.

Where is the conservative counterpart?

Technorati tags:








Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Are you a blogger and a twitterer?

The folks at twitterfeed.com are providing an automated service that captures your blog's Atom or RSS output at regular intervals and posts up to 140 characters of each blog post to Twitter. You can post under your existing Twitter ID, or set up a new one for the blog. It's free and in beta test status at this time.

For a ridiculous example of how this can work, see I Can Has Cheezburger, which is the twitterfeed-powered version of the infamous "LOL" bad-grammar cats macro-meme explosion that has been amusing (or irritating) everyone all over the "intertubes."

Technorati tags:










Two ways to access Twitter from the mobile web

See Introducing Twapper 2.0b: Mashing 30boxes and Twitter on the 30boxes blog. 30boxes is an "identity aggregation" service for Web 2.0.

They're offering another way to access Twitter from the mobile web that has some advantages over Twitter's own m.twitter.com interface. In a nutshell, Twapper lets you view expanded URLs, more photos, and other things that you can't view directly through Twitter Mobile. If you already are a 30boxes user, you can mesh Twapper in with the other features of 30boxes. It works on a PDA or on a conventional cell phone, subject to memory and other limitations of the device.

Click here to access Twapper. Access to the basic display features is free and no registration is required.

Technorati tags: